Skip to content
Sign in Submit your app

ADI vs ARIA Protocol

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ADI compared with ARIA Protocol
DetailADI logo ADIARIA Protocol logo ARIA Protocol
What it doesAgents on your own machine Open protocol for AI agent identity, DNS-anchored and post-quantum native, governed by a nonprofit
StageNot given Startup
FoundedNot given 2026
Based inUS MX
Pricing modelFreemium Open source
PricingNot given Free to use. L0 credentials issued today. L1 enabled in agent.bar demonstration. L2 and L3 specified but not yet issued.
Key features
  • Persistent agent memory across runs
  • Runs headless on Linux without user interaction
  • Task tree with webhooks and event triggers
  • Multi-machine mesh networking
  • Local dashboard at app.adi with hot-reloading
  • W3C Verifiable Credentials (AID format)
  • Four trust levels (L0-L3) with progressive verification
  • DNS anchoring starting at L1
  • ML-DSA-65 + Ed25519 composite signatures
  • ARIA AP for signed requests and receipts
  • Append-only Trust Ledger with credential lifecycle events
  • Revocation capability with signed status lists
  • Public REST API verification endpoint
  • TypeScript SDK for credential verification
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no cloud dependency or account required
  • Source code is public and can be read, built and modified for your own use
  • Post-quantum native from launch, not a migration plan
  • Governed by nonprofit to prevent capture
  • Complements existing protocols without replacing them
  • L0 credentials issued and verifiable today
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)11 no change since last check23 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)37
Citation Flow (Majestic)1520
Referring domains (Majestic)710

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ADI More alternatives to ARIA Protocol

Get help