TextSight vs Groundnote
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
TextSight compared with Groundnote
| Detail | 
TextSight | 
Groundnote |
|---|
| What it does | Free AI Detector & Writing Assistant
| AI note taker that turns meetings into decisions and actions
|
|---|
| Stage | Growing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2025
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IN
| AU
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: up to 5 processed meetings per calendar week, no credit card required. Team: A$9.90/person/month (launch price, locked for 12 months). Business: custom pricing, contact sales.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Sentence-by-sentence AI highlighting
- 0–100 Humanization Score
- Multi-model detection (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Mistral)
- One-click rewrite suggestions
- Model attribution
- Chrome extension for inline scanning
- File upload support (DOCX, PDF)
- 20 free writing tools
- REST API access
| - Automatic extraction of decisions and action items with owners
- Full transcript alongside decisions for verification
- Support for multiple input methods: browser recording, file upload, or transcript paste
- Source quotes with timestamps and speaker attribution
- Evidence and confidence labels for extracted outcomes
- Pre-meeting briefs that resurface overdue items
- Shareable guest recaps that require no account to view
- Email and Slack notifications for meeting summaries
- Integration with task management systems (Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp)
- Commitment confirmation workflow for verified ownership
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Sentence-level evidence instead of a single percentage verdict
- Integrated rewrite path in the same product
- Calibrated across multiple AI model families, not just GPT
- Transparent accuracy benchmarks published openly
- Free tier is full product on quota, not stripped features
| - Evidence-linked outcomes with full transcripts and timestamps for verification
- Human confirmation of AI-inferred outcomes before they are treated as commitments
- Free plan with no credit card required and generous limits for individuals
- Privacy-first and made in Australia
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 38 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 4 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 41 | 21 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 85 | 8 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to TextSight More alternatives to Groundnote