spacesheep vs Onlay
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Shared workspace for teams and AI agents to create, collaborate and publish visual content | Publish documents for feedback, pull edits and comments back into your agent |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | GB |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Free (unlimited signatures, 200 files, 25 MB per deploy, 60 web searches per day, 7M tokens per month); Pro $4.50/month (12,000 files, 2 GB per deploy, 20M tokens per month, 2× longer pages, unlimited signatures); Max $9/month (50M tokens plus 8M on Claude Opus, voice, stacks, streams); Team $10/mem | Free plan: $0, up to five active documents, documents up to 4 MB, 1 GB storage, last ten versions restorable, invite up to ten people per document. Pro plan: $10 USD per month (billed as $120 per year) or $12 USD per month (billed monthly), unlimited active documents, documents up to 16 MB, 50 GB st |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 26 −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 56 | 0 |
4 details filled in for both companies.