spacesheep vs ARIA Protocol
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Shared workspace for teams and AI agents to create, collaborate and publish visual content | Open protocol for AI agent identity, DNS-anchored and post-quantum native, governed by a nonprofit |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | Not given | MX |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Open source |
| Pricing | Free (unlimited signatures, 200 files, 25 MB per deploy, 60 web searches per day, 7M tokens per month); Pro $4.50/month (12,000 files, 2 GB per deploy, 20M tokens per month, 2× longer pages, unlimited signatures); Max $9/month (50M tokens plus 8M on Claude Opus, voice, stacks, streams); Team $10/mem | Free to use. L0 credentials issued today. L1 enabled in agent.bar demonstration. L2 and L3 specified but not yet issued. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 26 −1 (down) since last check | 23 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 7 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 20 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 56 | 10 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to spacesheep More alternatives to ARIA Protocol