ScreenMake vs VideoUpscaler
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ScreenMake compared with VideoUpscaler
| Detail | 
ScreenMake | 
VideoUpscaler |
|---|
| What it does | Design App Store and Google Play screenshots in minutes, with AI assistance and one-click publishing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | GB
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: No card required. Pro: $19/month (or $17/month billed yearly at $204). Studio: $69/month (or $59/month billed yearly at $708).
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - AI Mode: describe screenshot changes in natural language and AI redesigns them
- Quick Draft: automatically generate a designed set from your app screens
- 34,000 design elements including icons, 3D objects, mockups, photos and backgrounds
- Translation into 39 App Store languages with per-language customization
- Export at App Store and Google Play sizes for phones, tablets and watches
- One-click publishing to App Store Connect
- Right-to-left layout support for Arabic and Hebrew
- Manual editing layer by layer for full design control
- Carry iPhone design to iPad without redesigning
| - Official n8n community node with native integration
- Support for 1080p, 2K, and 4K resolutions
- Server-side long-polling with ?wait=45
- Works with Make.com and Zapier
- Transparent per-second credit billing
- Original audio preserved
- Batch processing of multiple videos
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No design skills required: automated Quick Draft converts app screens to professional designs
- Single source for all markets: design once, translate into 39 languages and publish globally
- Free to design with paid plans only for publishing: no upfront cost to create
- Direct App Store integration: one-click publishing without leaving the platform
| - Single-step node for 4K rendering without extra wait loops
- Server-side long-polling reduces HTTP requests by over 90%
- Automatic credit refunds for failed tasks
- Ready-to-use templates for common workflows
- Credit packs that never expire
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 39 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 8 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 32 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 138 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ScreenMake More alternatives to VideoUpscaler