RailCall vs Cobrain
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | AI runs where you own it | Shared memory for Claude, ChatGPT and your AIs |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | Not given | IT |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | RailCall local runtime: free. RailHub Team: $5 per seat per month. Cloud agents: $5 per trained agent per month. Advanced thinking (overflow): metered against a budget you set, with 500 flows per month included. Storage on hub: $0.25 per GB-month with 5 GB free. | Free: $0, up to 1,000 notes. Pro: $9/month, unlimited notes and shares. Team: $7/seat per month (minimum 3 seats), company brain with multiple admins. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 26 no change since last check | 5 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 7 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 27 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 35 | 15 |
4 details filled in for both companies.