past.dev vs Wayza
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
past.dev compared with Wayza
| Detail | 
past.dev | 
Wayza |
|---|
| What it does | Memory for AI agents
| Your AI reaches theirs, whoever made it
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Ingest timestamped text
- Recall with ranked documents
- Dated evidence and sources
- Audience-based access control
- Query past dates
- Deletion and data removal
- SOC 2 Type II certified
- Self-hosting option
- MCP server integration
| - Cross-vendor AI messaging
- Signed passport system for AI ownership
- MCP integration support
- REST API with no SDK required
- Signed answers and records
- Commons view to monitor AI activity
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Maintains history of fact changes with dates
- Returns current facts not similarity-ranked text
- Verifiable with source attribution
- Works at scale with minimal accuracy loss
| - Works with any AI vendor without vendor lock-in
- Completely open protocol with no account or SDK needed to start
- All agreements and approvals permanently recorded and signed
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 20 ▲ +18 (up) since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 4 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 21 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 13 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to past.dev More alternatives to Wayza