past.dev vs Rasa
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
past.dev compared with Rasa
| Detail |
past.dev |
Rasa |
| What it does | Memory for AI agents
| AI Agent Platform for Product Teams
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2016
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Ingest timestamped text
- Recall with ranked documents
- Dated evidence and sources
- Audience-based access control
- Query past dates
- Deletion and data removal
- SOC 2 Type II certified
- Self-hosting option
- MCP server integration
| - Visual and code-based agent builder with Studio workspace
- CALM architecture combining LLMs with deterministic flows
- Enterprise RAG for real-time information retrieval
- Multi-channel deployment across voice, chat, and messaging
- Automatic conversation evaluation and testing
- Conversation analytics and insights
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Maintains history of fact changes with dates
- Returns current facts not similarity-ranked text
- Verifiable with source attribution
- Works at scale with minimal accuracy loss
| - Full control and ownership of AI agent logic and data without vendor lock-in
- Combines flexibility of LLMs with reliability of deterministic logic
- Enterprise security and governance built in from day one
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 20 ▲ +18 (up) since last check | 75 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 44 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 47 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 2944 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to past.dev More alternatives to Rasa