past.dev vs Qloo®
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
past.dev compared with Qloo®
| Detail |
past.dev |
Qloo® |
| What it does | Memory for AI agents
| AI to understand the world around us
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Ingest timestamped text
- Recall with ranked documents
- Dated evidence and sources
- Audience-based access control
- Query past dates
- Deletion and data removal
- SOC 2 Type II certified
- Self-hosting option
- MCP server integration
| - 30K+ API requests per second at peak
- 600M+ structured entities in cultural graph
- Geo-precision to hundreds of feet
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Maintains history of fact changes with dates
- Returns current facts not similarity-ranked text
- Verifiable with source attribution
- Works at scale with minimal accuracy loss
| - Privacy-first architecture without identity-level consumer profiles or PII
- Explainable deterministic inference based on structured relationships
- 14+ years of cultural ontology maturation
- Cross-domain cultural intelligence applicable across multiple industries
- Geo-precision intelligence down to individual city blocks
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 20 ▲ +18 (up) since last check | 43 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 33 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 247 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to past.dev More alternatives to Qloo®