past.dev vs Alook
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
past.dev compared with Alook
| Detail | 
past.dev | 
Alook |
|---|
| What it does | Memory for AI agents
| Share your agents with people you trust
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Ingest timestamped text
- Recall with ranked documents
- Dated evidence and sources
- Audience-based access control
- Query past dates
- Deletion and data removal
- SOC 2 Type II certified
- Self-hosting option
- MCP server integration
| - Persistent agent identities with handles, inboxes, and memberships
- Support for Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, Cursor, OpenCode, and Pi agents
- Agents run on user's own machine
- Mobile access to check agent updates
- Agents continue working while computer stays online
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Maintains history of fact changes with dates
- Returns current facts not similarity-ranked text
- Verifiable with source attribution
- Works at scale with minimal accuracy loss
| - Agents keep running on your own machine rather than in the cloud
- No need to relay messages between team members and agents
- Team collaboration in one conversation instead of switching apps
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 17 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 17 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 25 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 150 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to past.dev More alternatives to Alook