Groundnote vs CiteWidget
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Groundnote compared with CiteWidget
| Detail | 
Groundnote | 
CiteWidget |
|---|
| What it does | AI note taker that turns meetings into decisions and actions
| AI answer widget that cites the exact page from your PDFs and website
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | AU
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: up to 5 processed meetings per calendar week, no credit card required. Team: A$9.90/person/month (launch price, locked for 12 months). Business: custom pricing, contact sales.
| Free: 100 verified answers per month (forever). Starter: $12/month (billed yearly, $19 monthly). Pro: $49/month (billed monthly). Catalog: $299/month (billed monthly). Extra answers on paid plans: $0.01 each, up to $10/month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Automatic extraction of decisions and action items with owners
- Full transcript alongside decisions for verification
- Support for multiple input methods: browser recording, file upload, or transcript paste
- Source quotes with timestamps and speaker attribution
- Evidence and confidence labels for extracted outcomes
- Pre-meeting briefs that resurface overdue items
- Shareable guest recaps that require no account to view
- Email and Slack notifications for meeting summaries
- Integration with task management systems (Jira, Asana, Linear, ClickUp)
- Commitment confirmation workflow for verified ownership
| - Answers from PDF datasheets, manuals and website pages
- Page-level citations with highlighted PDF passages
- Claim-by-claim verification against source documents
- Refusal when answers cannot be found in documents
- Visitor-to-team contact messaging
- Weekly Monday email with analytics and unanswered questions
- Reads scanned and table-based PDFs
- Dashboard customization of colors and greeting
- Answers in visitor language
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Evidence-linked outcomes with full transcripts and timestamps for verification
- Human confirmation of AI-inferred outcomes before they are treated as commitments
- Free plan with no credit card required and generous limits for individuals
- Privacy-first and made in Australia
| - Every answer is checked claim-by-claim and cites the exact page it came from
- Refuses to guess; tells visitors when information is not in documents
- Reads what you already publish with no tagging or rewriting required
- Pay only for verified answers; refusals and tests are always free
- Handles tables and scanned PDFs with cell-level highlighting
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 8 | 0 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Groundnote More alternatives to CiteWidget