Dooza Crew vs ARIA Protocol

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Dooza Crew compared with ARIA Protocol
Detail	Dooza Crew	ARIA Protocol
What it does	Your AI team, in 2 minutes.	Open protocol for AI agent identity, DNS-anchored and post-quantum native, governed by a nonprofit
Stage	Not given	Startup
Founded	Not given	2026
Based in	Not given	MX
Pricing model	Free trial	Open source
Pricing	7 days free trial, then $49/month. Cancel before day 8 to pay nothing.	Free to use. L0 credentials issued today. L1 enabled in agent.bar demonstration. L2 and L3 specified but not yet issued.
Key features	Plain language job input Work completion with proof Phone apps for workspace management Data deletion on request	W3C Verifiable Credentials (AID format) Four trust levels (L0-L3) with progressive verification DNS anchoring starting at L1 ML-DSA-65 + Ed25519 composite signatures ARIA AP for signed requests and receipts Append-only Trust Ledger with credential lifecycle events Revocation capability with signed status lists Public REST API verification endpoint TypeScript SDK for credential verification
What makes it different	Setup in 2 minutes No tracking or data selling in mobile apps	Post-quantum native from launch, not a migration plan Governed by nonprofit to prevent capture Complements existing protocols without replacing them L0 credentials issued and verifiable today
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	35 +3 (up) since last check	23 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	4	7
Citation Flow (Majestic)	2	20
Referring domains (Majestic)	0	10

5 details filled in for both companies.