Command+K vs PLCGateway AI MCP
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Command+K compared with PLCGateway AI MCP
| Detail |
Command+K |
PLCGateway AI MCP |
| What it does | In-product AI assistant that answers from your documentation and acts as the signed-in user
| MCP server for industrial software that lets AI assistants connect machines, build screens and analyze production data
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| TR
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free trial: 14 days, no credit card required. AI Adopter: $29/month (beta price, regularly $79/month), includes 1,500 monthly credits. AI Pilot: $99/month (beta price, regularly $299/month), includes 6,000 monthly credits plus SSO, whitelabel, custom domain, and audit log export. Hosted MCP Endpoint
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Build MCP: Convert OpenAPI or GraphQL APIs to hosted MCP servers
- CMD+K Widget: Embeddable in-product chat assistant with one script tag
- Tool calling and action execution as signed-in user
- Knowledge base with citations
- OAuth 2.1 authentication gateway
- Direct Stripe meter event forwarding
- Per-user spend caps with auto-suspend
- Whitelabel branding
- SAML SSO and audit log export
- Custom domain support
| - Connect machines and create devices from plain language instructions
- Build process screens and report dashboards that engineers review before deployment
- Define production assets and calculate OEE for discrete, continuous or batch processes
- Query alarm statistics and production data in natural language
- Support MCP protocol over network HTTP or local stdio connections
- Works with any MCP-compatible AI client including desktop and self-hosted models
- Role-based access control matching viewer, operator and administrator permissions
- Audit logging of every write operation with user identification
- Acknowledge alarms and record batch results within user permissions
- Generate Python code examples for REST API integration
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Acts as the signed-in user to complete real tasks, not just answer questions
- Five-minute setup with one script tag, no complex agent design required
- Prepaid billing with no per-resolution charges or metered overage
- Direct control of customer relationship and billing through your own Stripe account
| - Built-in MCP server in every product, no separate AI add-on or cloud service needed
- Production data remains on-premise; nothing sent to cloud unless user's chosen AI model requires it
- Drafts protect production: AI-created screens and dashboards reviewed before going live
- Same access controls for AI as for people: roles, rights and logging
- Assists in user's own language and explains PLCGateway features through built-in help
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 26 | 0 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Command+K More alternatives to PLCGateway AI MCP