Skip to content
Sign in Submit your app

ADI vs Referee.chat

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ADI compared with Referee.chat
DetailADI logo ADIReferee.chat logo Referee.chat
What it doesAgents on your own machine An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inUS Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingNot given Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
Key features
  • Persistent agent memory across runs
  • Runs headless on Linux without user interaction
  • Task tree with webhooks and event triggers
  • Multi-machine mesh networking
  • Local dashboard at app.adi with hot-reloading
  • Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
  • Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
  • Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
  • Executes Python code to verify claims
  • Customizable acceptance standards
  • Matches pause and resume without losing work
  • Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
  • Spending limit per match
What makes it different
  • Runs entirely on your machine with no cloud dependency or account required
  • Source code is public and can be read, built and modified for your own use
  • Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
  • Panel from different vendors fails in different directions
  • Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing
  • Cost grows with ledger, not round count
  • Published matches become research record
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)11 no change since last check2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)30
Citation Flow (Majestic)1513
Referring domains (Majestic)731

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ADI More alternatives to Referee.chat

Get help