Zanii vs Cogna
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Zanii compared with Cogna
| Detail | Z
Zanii |
Cogna |
| What it does | Verifiable identity and proof-of-action for AI agents
| AI-native applications for critical work
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | AE
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Ed25519 signed receipts with hash-chaining
- TypeScript and Python SDKs
- Agent discovery and trust lookup
- One-call integration with OpenAI and Anthropic
| - AI-native applications for operational workflows
- Lattice knowledge layer for operational context
- Integration with existing systems
- Governance and access controls
- Blueprint process for opportunity identification
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance
- Managed service or self-hosted deployment options
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Open protocol verifiable offline without trusting Zanii
- Cryptographic proof of delegated authority and action
- Immutable append-only log anchored to public blockchain
- Verifiable agent identity with delegation and scoped permissions
| - Go from prototype to production in days
- Outcome-based pricing - pay when it works
- Captures tribal knowledge and makes it reusable across teams
- Integrates with existing systems without replacement
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 25 ● no change since last check | 46 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 32 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 6 | 216 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Zanii More alternatives to Cogna