Wan API vs TINTY
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Independent platform for Wan and Seedance video generation | Not given |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | UA |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | Wan 3.0: $0.0275–$0.110 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.0442–$0.182 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Pro: $0.126–$0.161 USD per billable second (1080p–4K, 30% savings); Wan 3.0 Prime Pro: $0.182–$0.217 USD per b | Free: 6 staged photos once with watermark, no card required. Base: $9/month for 10 staged photos. Standard: $39/month for 45 staged photos. Professional: $79/month for 100 staged photos. Listing pack: $29 once for 30 staged photos, valid 12 months. Yearly billing gives two months free. TINTY Studio: |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 15 +2 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 22 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 35 | 9 |
4 details filled in for both companies.