Wan API vs Cursed Cam
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Independent platform for Wan and Seedance video generation | AI-generated haunted security monitor from your own photos |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | Not given | GB |
| Pricing model | Paid | Not given |
| Pricing | Wan 3.0: $0.0275–$0.110 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.0442–$0.182 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Pro: $0.126–$0.161 USD per billable second (1080p–4K, 30% savings); Wan 3.0 Prime Pro: $0.182–$0.217 USD per b | Party: $69 (founding price, regular $99) for 4 cameras and 12 clips. Haunt: $139 (founding price, regular $199) for 9 cameras and 27 clips. Pro: $279 (founding price, regular $399) for 16 cameras and 48 clips. Add-ons: Extra scare +$5 per camera, Second story +$19, Rush +$15, Your brand on console + |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 21 −1 (down) since last check | 2 −1 (down) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 35 | 0 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Wan API More alternatives to Cursed Cam