UsingOpen vs CiteWidget
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
UsingOpen compared with CiteWidget
| Detail | 
UsingOpen | 
CiteWidget |
|---|
| What it does | Free AI chat with open models, no account or sign-up required
| AI answer widget that cites the exact page from your PDFs and website
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free with 10 prompts per day. UsingOpen Studio desktop app is $19 USD one-time purchase, or ¥99 CNY in mainland China.
| Free: 100 verified answers per month (forever). Starter: $12/month (billed yearly, $19 monthly). Pro: $49/month (billed monthly). Catalog: $299/month (billed monthly). Extra answers on paid plans: $0.01 each, up to $10/month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Access to 20+ open-weight AI models including DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Gemma, GPT-OSS, Kimi K3 and MiniMax M3
- No account required, no sign-up, no email or password needed
- 10 free prompts per day, reset at midnight UTC
- Chat history saved locally on your device, never sent to servers
- Streaming responses with visible reasoning for thinking models
- Compare two models side by side in the same conversation
- Live model availability status and real-time capacity information
- Responsive design, installable as standalone mobile app
| - Answers from PDF datasheets, manuals and website pages
- Page-level citations with highlighted PDF passages
- Claim-by-claim verification against source documents
- Refusal when answers cannot be found in documents
- Visitor-to-team contact messaging
- Weekly Monday email with analytics and unanswered questions
- Reads scanned and table-based PDFs
- Dashboard customization of colors and greeting
- Answers in visitor language
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Complete privacy - chat history stays only on your device and is never sent to servers
- Model picker with real-time availability, not a single locked-in assistant
| - Every answer is checked claim-by-claim and cites the exact page it came from
- Refuses to guess; tells visitors when information is not in documents
- Reads what you already publish with no tagging or rewriting required
- Pay only for verified answers; refusals and tests are always free
- Handles tables and scanned PDFs with cell-level highlighting
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 5 | 0 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to UsingOpen More alternatives to CiteWidget