Tugan.ai vs CiteWidget
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Tugan.ai compared with CiteWidget
| Detail | 
Tugan.ai | 
CiteWidget |
|---|
| What it does | AI agents create and publish your marketing across your channels, every day
| AI answer widget that cites the exact page from your PDFs and website
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2022
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free: 100 verified answers per month (forever). Starter: $12/month (billed yearly, $19 monthly). Pro: $49/month (billed monthly). Catalog: $299/month (billed monthly). Extra answers on paid plans: $0.01 each, up to $10/month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Short-form video creation for TikTok, Reels, and Shorts
- X/Twitter thread generation
- LinkedIn post creation
- Email and newsletter sequences
- SEO content and blog post generation
- Reddit post replies
- Performance analytics and optimization
- Content repurposing from videos and articles
- Trend detection and outlier radar
- E-commerce product content
| - Answers from PDF datasheets, manuals and website pages
- Page-level citations with highlighted PDF passages
- Claim-by-claim verification against source documents
- Refusal when answers cannot be found in documents
- Visitor-to-team contact messaging
- Weekly Monday email with analytics and unanswered questions
- Reads scanned and table-based PDFs
- Dashboard customization of colors and greeting
- Answers in visitor language
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - AI agents specialized for specific channels and marketing tasks rather than general-purpose content generation
- Content starts from real sources (videos, articles, URLs) instead of blank prompts for contextually accurate results
- Quality control through AI critic that removes AI-generated artifacts before publication
- Automatic performance tracking and optimization to double down on winning content
- Solo founder built and self-hosted infrastructure ensuring control and transparency
| - Every answer is checked claim-by-claim and cites the exact page it came from
- Refuses to guess; tells visitors when information is not in documents
- Reads what you already publish with no tagging or rewriting required
- Pay only for verified answers; refusals and tests are always free
- Handles tables and scanned PDFs with cell-level highlighting
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 40 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 7 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 618 | 0 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Tugan.ai More alternatives to CiteWidget