ScanChess vs Wan API
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Chess OCR for board images and handwritten scoresheets | Independent platform for Wan and Seedance video generation |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Pricing | Free: 10 credits on sign-up, 23 free tools, one AI explanation per day, daily practice. Pro: $4.99/month or $29.99/year, 100 credits every 30 days. Pro+: $19.99/month or $119.99/year, 500 credits every 30 days. | Wan 3.0: $0.0275–$0.110 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.0442–$0.182 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Pro: $0.126–$0.161 USD per billable second (1080p–4K, 30% savings); Wan 3.0 Prime Pro: $0.182–$0.217 USD per b |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 10 no change since last check | 11 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 27 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 43 | 35 |
5 details filled in for both companies.