| What it does | AI minds of real experts, on demand
| An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: 3 free answers when you sign up with no card required. Day pass: €5.99 for 10 credits valid for 24 hours, one payment with no renewal. Plus: €19 per month for 50 credits, cancel anytime. Signature minds (well-known experts) cost 3× credits: 3 credits for an answer, 9 credits for a full deliver
| Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Browse expert minds free, with sample answers and expert profiles visible without signing in
- Ask minds on the web and inside Claude, Cursor, Slack, Notion and other AI tools via MCP
- Upload documents or paste links with your question for context
- See price before asking, choosing between quick answers (1 credit) or full deliverables like PRDs (3 credits)
- Direct contact option with the real expert from any answer
- Private questions and answers, never used to train other models
- Automatic credit refund if a mind cannot answer your question
- 3 follow-up questions free on every answer with Plus plan
- Verified experts with real credentials and professional background
| - Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
- Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
- Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
- Executes Python code to verify claims
- Customizable acceptance standards
- Matches pause and resume without losing work
- Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
- Spending limit per match
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Real expert approval: every AI mind is built with and approved by a verified professional
- Experts are paid per answer (40% of answer price, 60% for Signature minds), aligning incentives
- Expert judgment starting from their actual methods and past decisions, not generic AI advice
- Works inside your existing tools (Claude, Cursor, Slack, Notion) via MCP, not a separate platform
- Automatic expert matching: system finds the best expert for each question, never by payment
| - Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
- Panel from different vendors fails in different directions
- Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing
- Cost grows with ledger, not round count
- Published matches become research record
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 ▲ +2 (up) since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 8 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 13 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 10 | 31 |
|---|
Sabli
Referee.chat