Referee.chat vs runchr

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Referee.chat compared with runchr
Detail	Referee.chat	runchr
What it does	An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence	A curated registry of agent artifacts for solo founders
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Free
Pricing	Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.	Not given
Key features	Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC Executes Python code to verify claims Customizable acceptance standards Matches pause and resume without losing work Shared ledger prevents re-derivation Spending limit per match	Classification across eight artifact types Public API for programmatic access
What makes it different	Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality Panel from different vendors fails in different directions Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing Cost grows with ledger, not round count Published matches become research record	A judgment layer that curates and task-tags tools instead of an undifferentiated list Pre-built agent stack recipes showing real implementations and tool combinations Designed specifically for one-person companies and solo founders
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	2 no change since last check	1 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	13	14
Referring domains (Majestic)	31	4

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Referee.chat More alternatives to runchr