Referee.chat vs Pelloran

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Referee.chat compared with Pelloran
Detail	Referee.chat	Pelloran
What it does	An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence	AI agents with exact memory and verifiable sources
Stage	Not given	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Not given
Pricing	Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.	Not given
Key features	Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC Executes Python code to verify claims Customizable acceptance standards Matches pause and resume without losing work Shared ledger prevents re-derivation Spending limit per match	Answers with exact facts and sources Bit-for-bit consistent outputs Exact integer arithmetic for models Open-source code under Apache-2.0 licence Beta access available
What makes it different	Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality Panel from different vendors fails in different directions Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing Cost grows with ledger, not round count Published matches become research record	Exact memory with source verification Deterministic, reproducible AI outputs Transparent about uncertainty Publicly auditable open-source models
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	2 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	13	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	31	0

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Referee.chat More alternatives to Pelloran