Referee.chat vs gamAI
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Referee.chat compared with gamAI
| Detail | 
Referee.chat | 
gamAI |
|---|
| What it does | An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
| Trust layer for AI agents with deterministic gating, isolated execution, and proof for every action
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
- Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
- Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
- Executes Python code to verify claims
- Customizable acceptance standards
- Matches pause and resume without losing work
- Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
- Spending limit per match
| - Deterministic gate that decides before running language models
- Isolated code execution with sandboxing and micro-VMs
- Append-only audit logs with SHA-256 manifests and hash-chained verification
- Honesty measurement under load across multiple nodes
- Fleet management with trust plane for machines
- OpenAI-compatible endpoints and MCP support
- 49% UI grounding capability on 600 tasks
- 95.2% tool calling accuracy
- 31.6 milliseconds p50 task latency
- 0.43% false claim rate on 12,344 recorded actions
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
- Panel from different vendors fails in different directions
- Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing
- Cost grows with ledger, not round count
- Published matches become research record
| - Complete auditability with cryptographic proof for every action
- No vendor lock-in with open standards and open source
- Measured honesty benchmarks with 0.43% false claim rate
- Production-ready with verified open source repositories and green CI
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 4 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 15 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 31 | 3 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Referee.chat More alternatives to gamAI