Reach MCP vs Referee.chat
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Reach MCP compared with Referee.chat
| Detail | 
Reach MCP | 
Referee.chat |
|---|
| What it does | LinkedIn MCP server for AI agents and agencies
| An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | $20/month for the first account, $7/month for accounts 2-10, $5/month for accounts 11+. One plan includes all features.
| Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
|
|---|
| Key features | - LinkedIn messaging and conversation management
- Connection request management
- Post activity and comment engagement
- LinkedIn post scheduling
- Activity monitoring dashboard
- Rotating proxy and rate-limit management
- Multi-account management for agencies
- REST API for custom integrations
| - Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
- Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
- Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
- Executes Python code to verify claims
- Customizable acceptance standards
- Matches pause and resume without losing work
- Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
- Spending limit per match
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Preview approval system: every write shows numbered preview before sending anything
- Eight built-in playbooks shipped as AI suggestions, no prompt engineering needed
- One MCP URL works with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, n8n, Make and other MCP clients
- 30% referral commission for agencies on client subscriptions for 12 months
| - Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
- Panel from different vendors fails in different directions
- Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing
- Cost grows with ledger, not round count
- Published matches become research record
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 18 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 13 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 60 | 31 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Reach MCP More alternatives to Referee.chat