Pixapi vs VideoLens
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Unified API for image and video generation with transparent, credit-based pricing | Turn any TikTok, Douyin or Xiaohongshu video into AI prompts |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing | 1 credit = $0.01. Billed per image or per second for video. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image: 2 credits/image. GPT Image 2.5 Flare: from 1 credit/image (1024x1024 low). GPT Image 2: from 1 credit/image. FLUX.2 Pro: from 3 credits/image. Seedream 5.0 Pro: from 4 credits/image. Qwen Image 3.0: 3 credits/im | Pay-by-minute credits: 10 minutes for 3.49 USD (19 CNY), 60 minutes for 5.99 USD (33 CNY), 90 minutes for 8.99 USD (49 CNY), 200 minutes for 15.99 USD (89 CNY). Credits calculated per second with fractions rounded up. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 11 −3 (down) since last check | 18 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 19 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 23 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 141 | 57 |
5 details filled in for both companies.