Pixapi vs Lumenfix
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Unified API for image and video generation with transparent, credit-based pricing | AI photo enhancer that restores clarity without face alteration |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Pricing | 1 credit = $0.01. Billed per image or per second for video. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Image: 2 credits/image. GPT Image 2.5 Flare: from 1 credit/image (1024x1024 low). GPT Image 2: from 1 credit/image. FLUX.2 Pro: from 3 credits/image. Seedream 5.0 Pro: from 4 credits/image. Qwen Image 3.0: 3 credits/im | Free: one photo per day without account, 10 daily credits when signed in. Credit packs: $2.99 for 40 credits (never expire). Pro: $15/month for 400 credits monthly (rolling over to 1,200 max), or $90/year. Per-run costs: Standard enhance 4 credits, Pro enhance 6 credits, Ultra HD 4K enhance 40 credi |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 11 −3 (down) since last check | 26 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 33 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 141 | 24 |
5 details filled in for both companies.