Palace vs VideoDB

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Palace compared with VideoDB
Detail	Palace	VideoDB
What it does	Self-hosted memory for AI coding agents	Build agents with visual intelligence
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	US
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Free / Open Core (€0, unlimited for solo developers). Team (€1,490/year or €104/month for 3 months then €149/month, up to 10 users). Growth (€3,490/year or €244/month for 3 months then €349/month, up to 30 users). Enterprise (custom pricing from €8,000+/year with custom seat counts beyond 30).	Free credits of $20 with no credit card required.
Key features	Not given	Video upload and streaming Video search by content and scenes Integration with Claude and MCP clients Multi-cloud deployment Support for live camera streams Dataset quality checking
What makes it different	Fully offline licensing with Ed25519 cryptographic verification Works with any MCP-compatible agent including Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex	Highest recall on 100-hour action retrieval benchmark among tested pipelines Integrates directly into Claude with one-click setup Processes 300+ TB of video with 1,000+ developers using weekly
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	5 no change since last check	45 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	12
Citation Flow (Majestic)	24	33
Referring domains (Majestic)	14	330

3 details filled in for both companies.