Palace vs Seamrail

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Palace compared with Seamrail
Detail	Palace	Seamrail
What it does	Self-hosted memory for AI coding agents	Connect AI agents to enterprise software without requiring an API
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	US
Pricing model	Not given	Contact for pricing
Pricing	Free / Open Core (€0, unlimited for solo developers). Team (€1,490/year or €104/month for 3 months then €149/month, up to 10 users). Growth (€3,490/year or €244/month for 3 months then €349/month, up to 30 users). Enterprise (custom pricing from €8,000+/year with custom seat counts beyond 30).	Not given
Key features	Not given	Browser-based workflow mapping without API requirements Automated task execution with read-back verification Three-step workflow process: define, map/approve, run/check Result verification and validation after action completion Exception handling with human review routing Support for systems without API availability
What makes it different	Fully offline licensing with Ed25519 cryptographic verification Works with any MCP-compatible agent including Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex	Works without requiring an API from target enterprise systems Operates through browser interface with defined boundaries Includes automatic verification to confirm tasks completed correctly Built from practical integration problems in real workflows
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	5 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	24	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	14	0

2 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Palace More alternatives to Seamrail