Palace vs Casama

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Palace compared with Casama
Detail	Palace	Casama
What it does	Self-hosted memory for AI coding agents	Self-hostable AI teammates with their own computers
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Free / Open Core (€0, unlimited for solo developers). Team (€1,490/year or €104/month for 3 months then €149/month, up to 10 users). Growth (€3,490/year or €244/month for 3 months then €349/month, up to 30 users). Enterprise (custom pricing from €8,000+/year with custom seat counts beyond 30).	Not given
Key features	Not given	Connect to AI apps via MCP protocol Persistent bot memory Schedule bots and triggers Multi-model support Approval workflows Local model support Row-level security Documented HTTP API Workspace encryption Action rules and budgets
What makes it different	Fully offline licensing with Ed25519 cryptographic verification Works with any MCP-compatible agent including Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex	Free and unlimited self-hosting with no paywall Works with any model provider or local models Persistent autonomy separate from chat interaction Secrets and credentials never visible to models Integrates with popular AI apps via MCP
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	5 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	24	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	14	0

2 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Palace More alternatives to Casama