Nimbalyst vs runchr

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Nimbalyst compared with runchr
Detail	Nimbalyst	runchr
What it does	Agent wiki and visual workspace for Claude Code, Codex and other AI coding agents	A curated registry of agent artifacts for solo founders
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Free
Pricing	Free: Nimbalyst app and personal wiki. Wiki Teams: $20 per user per month or $200 per user per year (currently free during beta).	Not given
Key features	WYSIWYG markdown editor with AI-assisted editing Red/green inline diffs for AI changes approval Visual editors for mockups, diagrams, and drawings Parallel agent session management File and session linking Persistent searchable session history Pull request review in Developer Mode MCP server support	Classification across eight artifact types Public API for programmatic access
What makes it different	Agents write the wiki as they work, eliminating manual documentation Open source and local-first: your data stays on your machine Built by Evergage founders who scaled to $250M ARR One unified workspace instead of multiple disconnected tools	A judgment layer that curates and task-tags tools instead of an undifferentiated list Pre-built agent stack recipes showing real implementations and tool combinations Designed specifically for one-person companies and solo founders
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	45 −5 (down) since last check	1 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	15	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	40	14
Referring domains (Majestic)	709	4

4 details filled in for both companies.