Your AI teammate that gets answers, follows up, and keeps people and AI agents moving together
An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
Stage
Startup
Not given
Founded
Not given
Not given
Based in
Not given
Not given
Pricing model
Freemium
Freemium
Pricing
10 free tasks (no credit card required), then $29/month for 20 tasks (founding price for first 50 teams, held for first 12 months if subscribed by December 31, 2026, then $59/month). Extra tasks $6 each when enabled. The people Emily contacts never pay.
Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
Key features
Works via email, Slack, and Discord without setup or inbox access
Reaches people across companies without requiring them to install anything
Remembers decisions and catches contradictions when plans change
Respects privacy and context by default
Coordinates work between people and AI agents on the same team
Provides each team member private follow-through from shared messages
Automatically follows up and waits through out-of-office periods
Bundles decisions and updates to minimize interruptions
Lets team members answer questions from collective memory without interrupting busy people
Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
Executes Python code to verify claims
Customizable acceptance standards
Matches pause and resume without losing work
Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
Spending limit per match
What makes it different
No setup required; just CC Emily on emails or add her to Slack/Discord
Works transparently as a teammate with her own name, not as an anonymous automation
Coordinates people and AI agents across company boundaries without requiring installations
Keeps context separate by channel, conversation and privacy level automatically
Remembers what was decided and catches contradictions to prevent miscommunication
Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
Panel from different vendors fails in different directions