Lanes vs Cogna
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Lanes compared with Cogna
| Detail | 
Lanes | 
Cogna |
|---|
| What it does | Run your agentic fleet at scale
| AI-native applications for critical work
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: $0 per month for 1 user. Pro: $19/month for up to 10 members. Enterprise: custom pricing.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Run multiple coding agents in parallel on separate git worktrees and branches
- Task board with live terminals for each agent session
- Access Profiles to control permissions for each agent
- Integration with 100+ providers
- Audit logs of all agent actions and refusals
- Self-hostable access layer
- On-demand GPU compute by the second
- Local-first execution keeping source code and output on user's machine
- Support for Claude Code, Codex, and other agentic clients
| - AI-native applications for operational workflows
- Lattice knowledge layer for operational context
- Integration with existing systems
- Governance and access controls
- Blueprint process for opportunity identification
- Enterprise-grade security and compliance
- Managed service or self-hosted deployment options
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Open-source access layer under Apache-2.0 so you can read the security model
- Enforce access permissions at the system level, not through prompts
- Centralized access control across all agents and platforms simultaneously
- Keep data portable with plain files on your own disk, no vendor lock-in
- Complete audit visibility of what every agent accessed and was denied
| - Go from prototype to production in days
- Outcome-based pricing - pay when it works
- Captures tribal knowledge and makes it reusable across teams
- Integrates with existing systems without replacement
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 7 ● no change since last check | 46 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 10 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 39 | 32 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 192 | 216 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Lanes More alternatives to Cogna