invideo vs SJolt

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

invideo compared with SJolt
Detail	invideo	SJolt
What it does	The agentic video editor for serious creatives	One API for the best generation models
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Pricing	Starter plan at €20/month (billed annually) with 400 credits per seat, Plus at €36/month with 2,000 credits per seat (40% off annual), Max at €75/month with 5,000 credits per seat (50% off annual). Credits are used for video generation and generative models. Additional credit packs available.	Free account with pay-per-use model. Pricing varies by model and task. Example rates: Seedance 2.5 text-to-video at $0.12/s (480p) to $0.675/s (1080p); Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash at $0.03/s (360p) to $0.30/s (4K); Grok Imagine Video 1.5 at $0.0225/s; Suno music generation at $0.06 per task; FLUX.2 Pro im
Key features	Editing agent with memory of all clips Batch editing multiple shots simultaneously Real-time multiplayer collaboration Script writing and storyboarding Custom agent creation Professional tools including color, audio, and 3D Access to Seedance video generation models Bring your own AI agents	Image generation model playground Video generation model playground Audio generation model playground API request previews Async task status polling Unified API across multiple generation models Usage-based model billing Model-level cost tracking Supports 36 generation models Image editing capabilities
What makes it different	Autonomous agents handle repetitive editing tasks without needing prompt engineering AI remembers all footage and retrieves clips by description instead of manual scrubbing Real-time multiplayer editing with live cursors for team collaboration Integrates custom or external AI agents directly into the editing timeline Full multitrack timeline editing with AI assistance across all plans	Single API request works across different generation models Test models in playground with same API fields before production One balance covers usage across all supported models Compare output quality and cost before choosing a model Long-running jobs run asynchronously with task ID polling
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	87 no change since last check	17 −1 (down) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	32	21
Citation Flow (Majestic)	57	30
Referring domains (Majestic)	20682	84

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to invideo More alternatives to SJolt