invideo vs FrameThrower
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | invideo | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | The agentic video editor for serious creatives | The reference app for the future creative |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2026 |
| Based in | Not given | US |
| Pricing model | Paid | Not given |
| Pricing | Starter plan at €20/month (billed annually) with 400 credits per seat, Plus at €36/month with 2,000 credits per seat (40% off annual), Max at €75/month with 5,000 credits per seat (50% off annual). Credits are used for video generation and generative models. Additional credit packs available. | Free plan: $0/month with 50 searches per day, 20 HD downloads monthly, 10 image searches monthly, up to 3 moodboards. Pro plan: $7/month or $84/year (billed annually, -50%), with 7 days free trial, unlimited searches, unlimited HD downloads, 200 image searches monthly, unlimited moodboards. Studio p |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 87 no change since last check | 12 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 20 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 57 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 20682 | 241 |
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to invideo More alternatives to FrameThrower