HorayAI vs LLMFly AI
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | HorayAI | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Production Ready Cloud with Low Cost | One API to access GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok models through an OpenAI-compatible interface |
| Stage | Startup | Not given |
| Founded | 2024 | Not given |
| Based in | US | GB |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing | Pay-as-you-go pricing for serverless inference charged per token and for on-demand deployments charged per GPU usage time. New users receive free credits. Text models range from $0.05 to $1.5 per 1M tokens (input and output), including Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct at $0.06/1M tokens, Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Inst | Usage-based pricing per model. GPT-6 Astra: $3 input, $15 output per 1M tokens (≤272K tokens/request); $6 input, $22.5 output (>272K). GPT-5.6 Sol: $1.5 input, $9 output (≤272K); $3 input, $13.5 output (>272K). Claude Haiku 4.5: $0.5 input, $2.5 output per 1M tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash: $0.3 input, $1 |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 15 no change since last check | 75 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 11 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 26 | 37 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 107 | 206 |
6 details filled in for both companies.