Flico vs Wan API
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Turn an image into an AI video in seconds | Independent platform for Wan and Seedance video generation |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Pricing | Lite: $12.00/month (690 credits/month, billed $144.00 yearly); Pro: $14.50/month (1,320 credits/month, billed $174.00 yearly); Ultra: $99.00/month (8,740 credits/month, billed $1,188.00 yearly). Image to Video costs 19 credits per video at 480p. Prices in USD. | Wan 3.0: $0.0275–$0.110 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Prime: $0.0442–$0.182 USD per billable second (480p–1080p with nsfw_checker enabled); Wan 3.0 Pro: $0.126–$0.161 USD per billable second (1080p–4K, 30% savings); Wan 3.0 Prime Pro: $0.182–$0.217 USD per b |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 19 no change since last check | 11 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 23 | 27 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 25 | 35 |
5 details filled in for both companies.