Command+K vs Guardian
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | In-product AI assistant that answers from your documentation and acts as the signed-in user | Human authority infrastructure for autonomous AI |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free trial: 14 days, no credit card required. AI Adopter: $29/month (beta price, regularly $79/month), includes 1,500 monthly credits. AI Pilot: $99/month (beta price, regularly $299/month), includes 6,000 monthly credits plus SSO, whitelabel, custom domain, and audit log export. Hosted MCP Endpoint | Free: $0 per month with 2 connections, 1 agent, 500 protected actions per month. Developer: $99/month with 25,000 billable executions included, then $0.001 per billable execution with $500 default overage cap. Business: Contact Sales for paid pilots and enterprise contracts. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 +1 (up) since last check | 3 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 26 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 26 | 18 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Command+K More alternatives to Guardian