Cogna vs Palace

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Cogna compared with Palace
Detail	Cogna	Palace
What it does	AI-native applications for critical work	Self-hosted memory for AI coding agents
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	GB	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Not given
Pricing	Not given	Free / Open Core (€0, unlimited for solo developers). Team (€1,490/year or €104/month for 3 months then €149/month, up to 10 users). Growth (€3,490/year or €244/month for 3 months then €349/month, up to 30 users). Enterprise (custom pricing from €8,000+/year with custom seat counts beyond 30).
Key features	AI-native applications for operational workflows Lattice knowledge layer for operational context Integration with existing systems Governance and access controls Blueprint process for opportunity identification Enterprise-grade security and compliance Managed service or self-hosted deployment options	Not given
What makes it different	Go from prototype to production in days Outcome-based pricing - pay when it works Captures tribal knowledge and makes it reusable across teams Integrates with existing systems without replacement	Fully offline licensing with Ed25519 cryptographic verification Works with any MCP-compatible agent including Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	46 no change since last check	5 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	10	3
Citation Flow (Majestic)	32	24
Referring domains (Majestic)	216	14

2 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Cogna More alternatives to Palace