Agentic AI research assistant that interprets lab results and turns research questions into cited, evidence-backed briefs
Watch multiple AI models debate live on any topic to discover truth through collision of perspectives
Stage
Established
Startup
Founded
2018
2024
Based in
CY
PL
Pricing model
Freemium
Not given
Pricing
Basic (free) with monthly usage allowance; Plus €18/month with 3x the Basic allowance; Pro €75/month with 13x the Basic allowance; Team €125/month for 3 seats then €37 per extra seat with 9x the Basic allowance per seat; Organization €150 per seat per month with Pro usage limits. Paid plans can purc
Free: $0/month with 3 debates per month. Pro: $5/month with 10 debates per month. Ultimate: $10/month with 30 debates per month. New users get 2 full debates with Pro features.
Key features
Semantic search across 40 million biomedical papers
Full-text reading and citation tracking
Trust Index for result reliability screening
Research landscape and concept mapping
Zotero library integration
Weekly research digest and personalized feed
PDF and Word report export with citations
Mechanistic links and hypothesis generation
Saved clusters for organizing research
AI vs AI live debates with multiple models assigned opposing positions
Investigations—chains of connected debates drilling from surface questions to root causes
Dilemma Solver for personal decisions and ethical choices
Hot Seat mode to challenge AI arguments directly
Human vs AI live structured debates in real-time
Echoes of History—debate with historical figures brought to life by AI
Voice Intelligence for audio-based interactions
Advanced analytics to track debate performance
Deep Research mode with academic and live sources
Support for multiple AI models including GPT-5, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini
What makes it different
Reads full-text papers instead of just abstracts for comprehensive analysis
Every claim grounded in verified citations with evidence-typed sources
Monitors when literature moves on and notifies users of updates
Constrained reasoning engine reduces AI hallucinations through literature grounding
Biology-native evidence engine with knowledge graphs for semantic understanding
Not a ChatGPT wrapper—multiple AI models clash simultaneously rather than a single AI perspective
Truth emerges from collision of diverse AI perspectives with no single bias dominating
Debate with historical figures brought to life by AI alongside modern models
Multiple engagement modes from passive observation to active real-time debate participation
Deep investigation mode for exploring root causes and full territory of complex topics
BioSkepsis
DebateAI.app