Skip to content
Sign in Submit your app

Aristra vs Referee.chat

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Aristra compared with Referee.chat
DetailAristra logo AristraReferee.chat logo Referee.chat
What it doesYour digital twin, working 24/7. An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
StageMVP Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inUS Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree: 100 credits per month, no card required. Plus: $29 per month for 3,000 credits per month. Pro: $99 per month for 10,000 credits per month. Prices in USD, billed monthly, cancel anytime. Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
Key features
  • Persistent memory that you approve and control
  • Proactive agents for daily briefs, follow-ups, and scheduled tasks
  • Custom agents you build and run
  • Aristra Compose for writing and documents
  • Tool connections through MCP: Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion, GitHub, Linear
  • Works on web, desktop, mobile, Telegram, Chrome extension
  • Real browser for autonomous web browsing and interactions
  • Document, PDF, and slide deck creation
  • Image generation from prompts
  • Encrypted storage with user-controlled key rotation
  • Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors
  • Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only
  • Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC
  • Executes Python code to verify claims
  • Customizable acceptance standards
  • Matches pause and resume without losing work
  • Shared ledger prevents re-derivation
  • Spending limit per match
What makes it different
  • Proactive autonomy: runs tasks without being asked and messages when done or needs approval
  • Works inside Claude and ChatGPT so your memory follows you without opening another app
  • Team mode with shared memory and role-based access control while keeping personal drafts private
  • All plans include the same features; pricing scales only by monthly credits, not by feature gatekeeping
  • Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality
  • Panel from different vendors fails in different directions
  • Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing
  • Cost grows with ledger, not round count
  • Published matches become research record
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)1 no change since last check2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)00
Citation Flow (Majestic)2113
Referring domains (Majestic)2231

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Aristra More alternatives to Referee.chat

Get help