Alook vs unify
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Alook compared with unify
| Detail | 
Alook | 
unify |
|---|
| What it does | Share your agents with people you trust
| Models that keep learning
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Persistent agent identities with handles, inboxes, and memberships
- Support for Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, Cursor, OpenCode, and Pi agents
- Agents run on user's own machine
- Mobile access to check agent updates
- Agents continue working while computer stays online
| - Continuous model training from user interactions
- Automatic quality improvement
- Reduced latency and cost over time
- User-owned learning flywheel
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Agents keep running on your own machine rather than in the cloud
- No need to relay messages between team members and agents
- Team collaboration in one conversation instead of switching apps
| - Models learn inside the harness rather than remaining frozen
- Eliminates the limitation of frozen models with notepads
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 19 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 56 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 26 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 37 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 150 | 610 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Alook More alternatives to unify