Alook vs Qloo®
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Alook compared with Qloo®
| Detail | 
Alook | 
Qloo® |
|---|
| What it does | Share your agents with people you trust
| AI to understand the world around us
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Persistent agent identities with handles, inboxes, and memberships
- Support for Claude Code, Codex, Grok Build, Cursor, OpenCode, and Pi agents
- Agents run on user's own machine
- Mobile access to check agent updates
- Agents continue working while computer stays online
| - 30K+ API requests per second at peak
- 600M+ structured entities in cultural graph
- Geo-precision to hundreds of feet
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Agents keep running on your own machine rather than in the cloud
- No need to relay messages between team members and agents
- Team collaboration in one conversation instead of switching apps
| - Privacy-first architecture without identity-level consumer profiles or PII
- Explainable deterministic inference based on structured relationships
- 14+ years of cultural ontology maturation
- Cross-domain cultural intelligence applicable across multiple industries
- Geo-precision intelligence down to individual city blocks
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 19 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 43 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 10 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 25 | 33 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 150 | 247 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Alook More alternatives to Qloo®