AgentLed vs Referee.chat

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

AgentLed compared with Referee.chat
Detail	AgentLed	Referee.chat
What it does	Book meetings for you with the right customers, investors, design partners, and founders	An AI panel debates your goal; a referee rules on re-checkable evidence
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free with 300 credits. Teams plan at €117.90/month with 10,000 shared credits per month, unlimited members and 5 workspaces. One-time credit top-ups available at €15 for 1,000 credits, €70 for 5,000 credits, or €130 for 10,000 credits. Custom plans available for agencies.	Free: $1.00 starting credit once. Credit plans from $10 top-up with no expiration. Your own key: 5% infrastructure fee after the first $5.00 of usage.
Key features	AI agent researches prospects and drafts personalized outreach Human-in-the-loop approval system requiring review before any message sends Integrates with existing tools: Clay, HubSpot, Calendly, Gmail, Slack, and 100+ other services Persistent Knowledge Graph memory that learns from corrections and outcomes Multi-model AI with Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Mistral support MCP Server integration for Claude Code and Codex ROI reporting tracking hours saved, cost avoided, and pipeline influenced White-label option for agencies to deliver AgentLed under their own brand	Panel of up to six AI models from different vendors Referee rules on re-checkable evidence only Searches academic databases: arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, Europe PMC Executes Python code to verify claims Customizable acceptance standards Matches pause and resume without losing work Shared ledger prevents re-derivation Spending limit per match
What makes it different	Only sends messages and takes CRM actions that you have explicitly approved Runs inside your existing tools instead of requiring you to switch platforms Learns from call outcomes to automatically refine targeting and messaging for the next campaign No per-seat fees; unlimited team members sharing one credit budget Replaces manual work that a Clay agency would bill €5,500+ per month for	Referee decides on evidence, not argument quality Panel from different vendors fails in different directions Stuck is a targeted question, not model thrashing Cost grows with ledger, not round count Published matches become research record
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	18 −1 (down) since last check	2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	4	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	22	13
Referring domains (Majestic)	40	31

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to AgentLed More alternatives to Referee.chat