ActSeal vs Kilimanjaro

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ActSeal compared with Kilimanjaro
Detail	ActSeal	Kilimanjaro
What it does	Ed25519-signed receipts for agent actions	Your AI. Your Data. Your Perimeter.
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Not given	Contact for pricing
Pricing	Free: 100 receipts per UTC day. Starter: $19/month via USDC, USDT, or ETH for 500 receipts per UTC day.	Cloud tiers for self-service, Enterprise tiers for sovereignty-first workloads, plus Kilimanjaro Core (Community Supported) for self-hosting.
Key features	Issue signed receipts over action hashes Public verification without authentication Payment via USDC, USDT, or ETH Idempotency-Key support for 24 hours stdio MCP integration Issue and consume one-shot receipts	Integrated data, security, and governance platform layer Agentic compute capabilities Identity management under customer-controllable boundary Cloud and Self-hosted deployment options Support for regulated AI-native applications
What makes it different	Portable cryptographic signatures verifiable by anyone without trusting the agent or service Built specifically for agent stacks and MCP/OpenAPI agents Cross-agent trust without sharing private keys	Transitions AI apps from MVP to enterprise-ready solutions Customer-controllable perimeter for data and governance Purpose-built for regulated, AI-native applications Hardened backend foundation for production workloads
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	1 no change since last check	2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	2	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	16	14
Referring domains (Majestic)	3	3

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ActSeal More alternatives to Kilimanjaro