Acequia vs Wordmap
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Acequia compared with Wordmap
| Detail | 
Acequia | 
Wordmap |
|---|
| What it does | A calm puzzle game about water, carved channels and a garden in bloom
| Free browser games for word reasoning, spelling, vocabulary, and city geography
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Seventy-four gardens across ten chapters
- Eight interactive pieces including pots, plants, rockers, gates, and bulbs
- Undo and Hint features for puzzle solving
- iCloud sync across iPhone and iPad
- Seven languages including Arabic with right-to-left support
| - Unlimited five-letter word rounds with no game limit
- Position and repeated-letter feedback after every guess
- Color-coded tile feedback: teal for correct position, coral for present elsewhere, navy for absent
- Repeated letters tracked by quantity matching answer count
- Review feature to identify weak guesses after solving
- Library of 216 reviewed practice answers
- Optional public ranking submission without login
- Local browser storage for solo statistics
- Word Pattern Explorer tool to inspect answer candidates
- Deterministic rules for game feedback, not AI-generated scoring
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No hidden mechanics or randomness; players can see where water will flow before pouring
- Time is measured in pours, not seconds, removing pressure
- Made by one person with care for every garden
| - Visible explanation behind each result, not hidden methodology
- Independent practice set with transparent editorial standards, not affiliated with other publishers
- No registration, payment, or login required to play and learn
- Finite checked datasets with clear boundaries and documented limitations
- Deliberate practice method focusing on weak decision review, not random repeated attempts
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 36 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 24 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 23 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 94 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Acequia More alternatives to Wordmap